MPs Expenses: Call a General Election

For the past two weeks, The Daily Telegraph has published the expenses claims of Ministers of Parliament, many of whom abused the systemGordon Brown meets representatives from the Red Cross, 5 May 2009 CROWN

These revelations severely undermined the political system and only a General Election will restore faith in it. 

Prime Minister Gordon Brown was right to tell the MPs who abused the system that they will not be allowed to stand again for election. So the sooner that election happens the better.

But in Prime Minister’s Question Time on Wednesday, Mr Brown said he would not call one because it would cause chaos. He also revealed his fear that the Conservative party would win.

But a General Election could put a fresh Government in place, with higher moral standards than the current one.

Today, Sir Peter Viggers, who made £30,000 worth of claims for gardening expenses, quit on the request of David Cameron.

By contrast, the prime minister defended James Purnell and Geoff Hoon, who said they did nothing wrong by not paying Capital Gains Tax.

Mr Brown said the Commons was acting like a gentlemen’s club, but he is supporting this club by refusing to call an election.

On Tuesday, Michael Martin, Speaker of the House of Commons and MP for Glasgow North East resigned his position and seat following a vote of no confidence from MPs including Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg.

Mr Martin’s resignation was a step in the right direction, removing a dogged defender of the status quo. He not only supported the gentlemen’s club, but was implicated in it. In the past, his wife claimed £4,000 of taxpayers money for taxis to go shopping.

His resignation means the next speaker will be the first elected Speaker of the House of Commons – a powerful role. Electing a speaker is a move towards changing the crooked system and more of these changes are needed. But even if these changes do not happen, we need more MPs like Vince Cable and David Cameron, who act honestly despite a system which allows rules to be bent and broken.

No person is above the law, especially not an MP. These MPs knew Freedom of Information legislation would result in greater transparency, but they continued to behave dishonestly.

This dishonesty shows a lack of respect to their employers – the public who elected them.

The  British public know the facts about the people who run their country. Now they should have the opportunity to make up their minds if they want to sack them.



Filed under Opinion

2 responses to “MPs Expenses: Call a General Election

  1. If party leaders refuse to act against the miscreants, then they run the risk of the people doing it at the next election. In other words, political parties may lose votes simply because their chosen MP is ‘tainted’. It would serve them right of course, but they would be better of acting decisively now.

  2. Jess Shankleman

    I agree and surely parties should make sure they choose candidates of high morals before putting them in the running.
    With backbench committees like the 1922 committee, the public should be able to trust political parties to put good candidates up.
    But I think it will be a long time before the public trust any political parties again. It’s just a circus.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s